Google
Web pcflank.com
PC Flank Logo
Make sure
you're protected
on all sides
 Test Your System
 Ask the experts
 Community
 Security Center

 

Tip of the day
If possible, disable the caching of secure pages in your browser.

Articles Library

Webroot Desktop Firewall Review

May 14, 2005 - Part II

by Andrew Cooper

With little effort, I got to the program's main window:

access permissions of main window

It looked nice and simple, but I couldn't locate the real-time traffic monitor I wanted so badly. Later I found out it's not even provided, and that left me looking for any other benefits or interesting features the program might have.

On the left pane of the program three categories are shown. The first one gives users a view of the status of their firewall. The second, the Settings tab, offers to make necessary settings to the program such as an option to "stealth" people's Internet presence, and to specify if resource sharing over the LAN should be allowed, and other more basic settings that are found in most programs of this class. The third icon, Permissions, lists programs with their modifiable Internet access permissions and blocked IPs list.

The program at work

The program consumes 12 Mbs of RAM memory in its three spawned processes. Every time an unknown program, or one which the user has set to "ask for permission" in the Permissions setting, requested to access the Internet, the firewall brought up the following confirmation screen:



As with all firewalls, the user decides what to do with the program - whether or not it should be granted permission to access the Internet. It's really too bad the creators didn't compile a list of known or often-used programs that legitimately access the Internet, where users' interaction would be unnecessary. Desktop Firewall doesn't even give recommendations on what the user should do in case he/she is unfamiliar with the requesting program. And weblinks on the program's interface that were supposed to help weren't working.

I started to feel disappointed with the program as I was using it, partly because of some minor errors and under-functionalities, but my discontent with it really set in when it blocked my Intranet resource sharing despite the fact that I'd allowed it. I thought maybe the program could make up for its past errors, and decided to subject the firewall to "leak tests" -- a common measure of a firewall's performance.

And to my surprise it failed all of them -- proving its absolute uselessness.

tooleaky test failed

By that time I was really sick and tired of this program, so I uninstalled it and then I felt much better. I then returned to the firewall I'd been using before - in future articles hope to find one that is at least on par with the two products I mentioned earlier.

Verdict



In its present state, this program is a waste of time and, if purchased, money as well. It's no better than the Windows SP2's free firewall, and can hardly be called a firewall -- rather, a "bagel hole".

Developer's web site: www.webroot.com
To download the program click here

Read next:
Back to Part I



  Discuss this article on the Forum

 
 
Start Page
Make "PC Flank" your   
Start Page!   
Make

 
In the Spotlight
» One man's job

» Outpost Firewall Pro Review

   
 

 
Sponsored links


   
 
Related Links
» 2003 tests:
Personal Firewalls
vs.
Leak Tests:
Part II:
"Leak Tests
Win Again!"

» 2002 tests:
"Personal Firewalls
vs Leak tests"
part I

   
 

 
   
Outpost Firewall PRO 3.0 - complete protection on the Internet!

Secure Internet surfing with Oupost personal firewall with antispyware and free firewall available for download at www.agnitum.com.
 
Privacy Policy
    Advertiser Info
Site Map
    Contact Us

 
 
© 2006 PC Flank Ltd. All rights reserved.